Take into consideration how many people create pure AI-generated music. Some percentage of those people will have made it for others as a ‘gift’.
“Make me a song, Daddy!” the young daughter might ask.
And he makes her a song with AI. He tells it to make a song for a little girl about her $personality_traits. And the AI makes the song, and Daddy shows his daughter the song. And she loves it.
Here’s the problem:
The daughter knows that her dad didn’t make the song himself. So, she psychologically attributes some percentage of the love and feeling she has for this song, which cites her very specific $personality_traits, toward the AI.
There is a conflict here for the daughter. Does she emotionally submit to the AI? Does she allow herself to have feelings for it, as she does her dad, for having the remaining percentage of credit for writing the song for her?
This may be very dangerous for the future. People should *not* emotionally submit to any AI, technology or any non-sentient being.
When you unilaterally remove approved programs that benefit peoples’ health and education, bully and start wars with your peers, ridicule, talk down to and remove earned benefits for the military vets that protected your war-dodging ass your whole life, seek to control every aspect of peoples’ personal lives, are a narcissistic, tyrannical lunatic in public and private (and apparently are proud of it,) and sabotage the habitability of planet Earth itself…You are not a leader. You are a Sadist.
“There are doors that they’re afraid to go in, and they don’t want us to go in there either, because if we go in, we might learn something that they don’t know. And that makes us a little out of their control.” – Ken Kesey
We drove
Away from disaster
I told, you
The flames were getting faster
But now, I have to go back
I have to walk between the stacks
This disaster is different, it seems
Benzene’s the one killing me
And I’m so sorry, that
I can’t be there for you, for me
This isn’t how it’s meant to be This isn’t how it’s meant to be
